Where the accused gave some blows on the victim by the handle of an axe and none of the blows fell on vital parts of the body, it was held that the accused should be convicted under section 325 and not under section 307 for attempted murder. Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt. But they must do it by lawful means and not by unlawful. But now what is to be done? All the accused persons, Ram Lagan and his family members were known to each other. We have carefully considered the rival contention and perused the impugned judgment and material on record.
The respondent qualified in all the tests for selection to the post of temporary Head Constable Ministerial. The witnesses ran away from the place and came back only after some time and they were informed that injured Ramesh was removed from the scene of occurrence by a police constable. The five accused, namely, Tribhuwan, Sita Ram, Ram Suresh, Rajendra and Ram Vijay, who suffered conviction and sentence, filed Criminal Appeal No. यदि कोई भी, साधारण मार-पीट करते समय किसी व्यक्ति को घोर उपहति, चोट या हानि पहुंचाता है तो यह मामला आईपीसी की धारा-325 के तहत आता है। यह अपराध जमानती और समझौतावादी है। साथ ही इस धारा के अंतर्गत पुलिस किये गए अपराध का संज्ञान ले सकती है अथार्त शिकायती के बयान के आधार पर पुलिस सीधे एफआईआर दर्ज करती है। आरोपी अगर दोषी करार दिया जाता है तो उसे अधिकतम सात वर्ष तक का कारावास हो सकता है और जुर्माना भी देना पड़ सकता है। इस दावे के दौरान अगर दोनों पक्षों में समझौता होता है तो न्यायालय की आज्ञा से ही किया जा सकता है । 1. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session. The totality of the circumstances must be taken into consideration in arriving at the conclusion whether the accused had a common intention to commit an offence with which they could be convicted.
Imprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or both. It is not the business of the medical officer to classify a hurt as grievous or simple; his duty is merely to describe facts, upon which it is the duty of the Magistrate to find whether the hurt is grievous or otherwise. The points requiring proof of voluntarily causing grievous hurt are: 1 That the accused caused hurt. The appellants and Partheeban-Accused No. In other words, the award of punishment would include both, i. In other words, his submission was that though the High Court instead of awarding any jail sentence awarded only the fine of Rs.
Learned counsel further pointed out that this Court should also take into consideration the two circumstances appearing in the case, namely, the incident in question occurred in 1980 and in the meantime, 37 years has passed in prosecuting this litigation, and second, both the Courts below, on appreciation of evidence, have come to a conclusion that no injury was caused by respondent No. The facts have been given in the impugned judgment and hence we are not repeating the same here, except wherever necessary. If the above two conditions are satisfied then the operative part of the provision comes into play i. Against that order the respondent filed a writ petition which has been allowed by the Delhi High Court and hence this appeal. Taking us through the evidence onbehalf of the respondent, learned Senior Counsel Mr.
On the contrary, there was much that we should applaud. Let students demonstrate, if they please, for the causes in which they believe. We respectfully agree with the Delhi High Court that the cancellation of his candidature was illegal, but we wish to give our own opinion in the matter. This incident attracted many persons living in the area and who were passing on the road. Aggrieved by the verdict of conviction, accused preferred appeal before the High Court. आई श्री इक़बाल शर्मा से कहा सुनी हो गई और इस कहा सुनी में सैफ अली खान व उनके मित्रों ने इकबाल शर्मा और उनके रिश्तेदारों की पिटाई कर दी जिसके बाद श्री इकबाल शर्मा ने कोलाबा पुलिस थाने में सैफ अली खान और उनके साथियों के खिलाफ शिकायत दर्ज कराते हुए कहा कि मार पिट के समय सैफ अली खान ने उन्हें घूंसों से प्रहार किया जिससे उनके नाक की हड्डी टूट गयी है। इस शिकायत में घोर अहित, हानि थी इसलिए इसे धारा 325 के अंतर्गत पंजीकृत किया गया, सैफ अली खान के साथ उनके साथियों का भी नाम होने से को भी जोड़ दिया गया। क्योंकि धारा 325 संज्ञेय है इस लिए पुलिस अधिकारी ने इसका संज्ञान लेते हुए दोषियों को हिरासत में ले लिया और इस धारा के जमानती होने से कुछ समय में जमानत भी मिल गई। और जानकारी के लिए नीचे दिए लिंक पर क्लिक करें। ध्यान दें: यहाँ पर ऊपर दिया गया उदाहरण केवल भारतीय दंड संहिता की विभिन्न धाराओं और किए गए अपराधों के तालमेल को समझने के लिए दिया गया है और इसी लिए उदाहरण को चर्चित समाचार के माध्यम से बताने की चेष्ठा की गई है। साक्ष्य के रूप में उन समाचारों के लिंक को उपर प्रस्तुत किया गया है जो उदाहरण के लिए प्रयोग किए गए है। अतः यह उदाहरण मन गढ़ंत नहीं है।. Incorporating substantial garden table and a garden can be turned by comfortable chairs in to a house dishes.
As a consequence, the order of the Sessions Judge so far as the State was concerned, became final. Disclaimer: यह जानकारियां इन्टरनेट पर उपलब्ध कई अन्य स्रोतों से ली गई है और इन जानकारियों को इस पृष्ट पर केवल प्रयोक्ता को सामान्य ज्ञान उपलब्ध करवाने के उद्देश्य से प्रस्तुत किया गया है इसलिए इंडिया हेल्पलाइन यहां उपलब्ध लेख सामग्री की कोई जिम्मेदारी स्वीकार नहीं करता है। यदि आपको इस लेख में किसी प्रकार की त्रुटि, आपत्ति, भेदभाव, घृणा इत्यादि का आभास होता है या कोई भी अशोभनीय सामग्री दिखती है जिससे किसी की भावना को ठेस पहुंचती है या किसी प्रकार का साहित्यिक चोरी का आभास होता है तो कृपया आप इस की रिपोर्ट इस लिंक पर करें धन्यवाद।. To invoke the aid of Section 34 successfully, it must be shown that the criminal act complained against was done by one of the accused persons in the furtherance of the common intention of all; if this is shown, then liability for the crime may be imposed on any one of the persons in the same manner as if the act were done by him alone. Minds regarding the sharing of common intention gets satisfied when an overt act is established qua each of the accused. In other words, if the convict was in prison, for whatever reason, during the stages of investigation, enquiry or trial of a particular case and was later convicted and sentenced to any term of imprisonment in that case the earlier period of detention undergone by him should be counted as part of the sentence imposed on him.
After all, youth will be youth. This being the principle, it is clear to their Lordships that common intention within the meaning of the section implies a pre-arranged plan, and Page 6 - 7 - to convict the accused of an offence applying the section it should be proved that the criminal act was done in concert pursuant to the pre-arranged plan. But this cannot be said to be an act in furtherance of common intention to commit the murder of Ramesh along with accused No. Period of detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the sentence of imprisonment. The respondent filed a petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal which was dismissed on 13. Where the accused, a young boy, had inflicted only one blow on the chest of the deceased at the spur of the moment on a sudden quarrel, it was held that he had committed an offence under section 325.
So far as Section 428 of Code is concerned, it provides that the period of detention spent in jail as under-trial or as convict will be set off against his total jail sentence once awarded to him in connection with the same offence. If that be so then he need not undergo any more jail sentence. Common intention essentially being a state of mind it is very difficult to procure direct evidence to prove such intention. Ipc Section 325 isn't just functional add your backyard, but also enhance comfort. Imprisonment for 3 years and fine. The respondent submitted his reply on 17.
They have already served a week in prison. What are the offences affecting the human body and punishment for the crime? Where the deceased had received two lacerated wounds on his scalp by a lathi and both these were simple in nature, the accused were held guilty of committing an offence under this section in furtherance of common intention. As a consequence thereof, the appeal against Sita Ram and Rajendra stood abated. At that time, one person belonging to the accused party came and informed that at the corner of lane, Anand-friend of the accused party was cut by the person who came for the settlement talks. Common intention is seldom capable of direct proof, it is almost invariably to be inferred from proved circumstances relating to the entire conduct of all the persons and not only from the individual act actually performed. It was founded in 1957 as the Institute for Printed Circuits.