In the book, she moved in with the Finches to be a female role model for Scout, but spent most of her time nagging the family and sharing her opinions about the townspeople's social status. In this essay I will be explaining the similarities and differences between the two. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two. Throughout the book, Scout and Jem acquire a friend, Dill, and the three grow up together finding out valuable life lessons and qualities one should possess. I also love who they chose to play the characters in the movie.
It made much more sense. After losing his pants, Jem waits until later that night to return to the Radley house to get them. I believe this captivation was important to the story line because it was the main foundation of the children's imagination. That is a colossal piece missing from this movie. Many people enjoy the advantage of being able to visualize a character; however, viewers can be thrown out of the story if the actor playing the part doesn't fit the reader's vision of the character.
We learn that it is a sin to kill a mockingbird, that taking advantage of a powerless man is a sin. This fascination between the children and Boo was why the children had such an imagination. Ewell who attacked Jem and Scout. To Kill a Mockingbird book cover The book includes many other themes besides the glaring racial struggles portrayed in the film. Calpurnia goes to the court during the trial of Tom Robinson and tells Atticus that Jem and Scout are not at home. The film ignores the confusion Scout felt when an obviously innocent man was found guilty.
There are many similarities between the book and the movie of To Kill a Mockingbird. But that was probably because I was daydreaming while reading. I also found there to be huge differences in the trial. A director has to try to turn fictional characters into real people, and transfer the theme of the story into the film. Unlike today's films, movies in 1962 weren't allowed to cover such controversial subject matter.
They stayed pretty faithful to the book but changed some things that needed to stay. Scout experiences that hatred and biased will sully her knowledge of human goodness. The idea that blacks would sit separate from whites would have been expected — or understood, at the very least — by anyone viewing the film. To Kill A Mockingbird - Differences between Movie and Book There are usually differences in two different versions of something. Remember, though, that at the time this film was in theaters, audiences wouldn't have needed an explanation for these sorts of things. And characters can say things with facial expressions, hand gestures, and posture that an author must describe to readers.
I think Aunt Alexandra was a huge part of the story, and I think they should have kept her in the movie. The ending of the novel and the film are also the same. This took a significantly powerful role out of the plot; preventing any arguments, any overheard conversations, and at the end of the story: the time when she became more a mother to Scout then an adversary, out the story that was originally intended for the audience to read. So in seventh grade I read Mockingbird for the first time and loved it. Also, Sherriff Tate informs Atticus that it was Mr. I found that the Finch family as a whole was enacted very appropriately. Usually the evil force is unable to conquer, because of the opposite side's mentality.
Overall, the movie and the book together were fantastic, but we prefer the book over the movie. In the Scottsboro case, the girls said that the accused boys met them while hoboeing on a train car in Alabama. The main force driving Scout to grow up into a proper woman in the book was Aunt Alexandra and she was left out of the movie. Putting every single small detail that was in the book such as Jem loving football into the movie would have made an already fairly long film too long. Movie To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, is a story about Jem and Scout Finch, who are being raised by their father in Maycomb, Alabama, during the Great Depression.
The children thought Boo was a creeper who came out at night to eat cats and squirrels. Another similarity is that the African American community of Maycomb showed Atticus a lot of respect. In chapter 2 in the novel, you are introduced to Mrs. Focus Because a film has a limited time in which to tell the story, events from a novel are invariably dropped when the book becomes a film. A huge difference between the book. The novel starts out with Jem and Scout meeting Dill.
First the positive points: This film attaches faces to Scout, Jem, Miss Maudie, and Dill, since no description of their faces is given in the book. And when that happens, you get to relearn things and never learn things. His patience with Scout, his understanding of Atticus' situation, and support thereof, all were different to the norm of the community in the south, therefore showing that not everyone fit the stereotype. Scout is angry because she got in trouble, and attacks Walter in the schoolyard. The benefit of film is that viewers get to see the characters. A very important sub-plot and character that was eliminated from the movie was that of Aunt Alexandra. To begin with, there are many similarities between the book and movie To Kill A Mockingbird.
In the novel, Dill has blonde hair. Burris Poverty in America is not always was the way people think it is. For starters, I realize that you never see scouts teacher Mrs. Several events in the book are excluded from the movie, but should be included. Scout is growing up during the 1930s, a time of discrimination against African Americans. My reasoning for this is that the movie seemed much more interesting to me.