However it is also more dangerous, it may mutate your genes by inserting another gene, and they could damage your heart or liver. With now everyone taking the drug whether they want to or not, This vicious cycle just gets bigger. Most fans of running--or any sport, for that matter--agree that should be prohibited, and that dopers should be penalized when caught. Athletes have been using drugs since the first Olympic games in ancient Greece. So how is this advantage different from the advantage that an athlete would get from drugs.
It was indeed a glove: leather, rather stiff, with short fingers and no webbing. If that's the case -- and I say it is -- then how can we leave out Pete Rose, the all-time hits leader and most memorable competitor of his era? When performance-enhancing drugs have the power to overcome differences in natural talents and the willingness to sacrifice and persevere in the quest to perfect those talents, we cannot avoid confronting the question, What do we value in sport? Even worse, it has been found that organized criminals are involved in distributing illegal substances not just to athletes, but even to their doctors and coaches. The side effects of these drugs are increased blood pressure, aggression and anxiety, addiction, loss of appetite, increased and irregular heart beat, chest pains, headaches and palpitations. When a professional athlete admits to using steroids, the message young athletes hear is not always the one that is intended. Therefore doping should not be allowed in any sport circumstances. No one is forced to become a competitive athlete.
This rule accomplishes two things. One reason for this would be actually for the safety of athletes. Also they are not good for people so this kind of drug use should not be encouraged or permitted. If you take a look at this it will give more insight about steroids in general, the different types, and the harm that they cause to athletes. Second, and unaddressed by Musburger, doping affects the integrity of sport.
They make game play unfair. How does rubbing a cream into your skin display dedication and commitment? Athletes hoping to improve their performance are often the first people to try substances; this places them at risk of side effects. One thing to bear in mind is that the very act of participating in many sporting activities is dangerous. Even if you drink 10 cups of coffee in a day, no one would certainly care. The same situation applies here and these people say that the choice should be up to the athlete. Taking performance enhancing drugs over a long period of time can pose as a health risk to the players. Infrequent testing completely nullifies the scientific reliability of testing as evidence of non-use.
The rules would allow athletes to meet or exceed their maximum abilities as humans while making it safer than the modern state. It can cause physical damage to the body such as liver, And kidney abnormalities, Tumors, High blood pressure, Heart and circulatory problems. There is clear evidence that shows an athletic performance benefit from ribose supplements. In fact, a study released last year, and one of the few studies to actually attempt to find out what motivates teen boys to take steroids, found that the most reliable indicator of steroid use was a teen's own self, self esteem and body image. But the shortstop hit 33 home runs in 1996, right in the heart of the steroid era. At this point, the dignity the athlete had for losing despite an honest effort is taken away.
I have not suggested that drug use should be permissible in sport because there might be persuasive arguments for proscription I have not addressed. According to article on www. Not to mention the fact that performance enhancing drugs being legal would cause a biological arms race in the game which would hurt players of the sports. The athletes are only seeing the short term advantages it has for them but long term effects include irritability, depression, and suicidal thoughts and with a lot of abuse comes liver, kidney, and heart failure. If performance enhancing drugs were allowed, not only would the playing field be levelled, it would be at a higher level, A huge part of watching sports is witnessing the very peak of human athletic ability, and legalizing performance enhancing drugs would help athletes climb even higher.
Those suits have now been banned from competition. Even if the athlete wins, he or she knows that that their victory had not been earned. Unfortunately doping can sometimes be very harmful and may endanger the athlete? Athletes take to drug to get a competitive advantage. Progress in gene therapy is increasing and the doping control agencies have realized that they need to engage the interest and creativity of top scientists, who are now working on a variety of promising strategies to detect gene doping. As technology advances it may simply become that the team with the best scientists, who can produce the most effective cocktail of performance enhancing strategies, will win.
Rules are changed at times to preserve a sport. Armstrong never tested positive in his career, nor did Bonds or Clemens. Others say that athletes should be free to do whatever they want to their own bodies. What of dieticians tampering with foods and additives - drugs by any other name - to improve performance? Athletes, caught in the sport arms race, would be pressed to take more and more drugs, in ever wilder combinations and at increasingly higher doses. So are the penalties too forgiving? The rules in each sport in effect determine which characteristics among all possible sources of difference influence who wins and who loses. If performance-enhancing drugs were allowed, they say, then it would soon be impossible to remain competitive without taking them, thereby eliminating from the pool of athletes people who want to maintain a healthy lifestyle.