. To this extent, prisoners are the very people who should have the right to vote, in order to rectify the social situation which contributed to their crime and subsequent imprisonment. Such is their damaged relationship with society. But even if it were acceptable as policy, denying felons the vote has been a disaster because of the chaotic and partisan way it has been carried out. They have developed a list of 47,000 voters who may be felons, and have asked local officials to consider purging them. Otherwise, they may base their vote on a topic of interest, such as the legalization of a certain drug, etc.
A person should only be punished on the nature of the crime. Of course, granting the right to vote is not enough to create a robust prison constituency. Despite this, there are a number of countries where leaders believe that the disenfranchisement of prisoners, merely as a result of their imprisonment, is a justified and prerequisite… 1617 Words 7 Pages Should Prisoners Have Rights? When it comes to inmates losing the right to vote many are on the fence. Dear James, Thanks for taking time to write your reply. A democracy does not function as a democracy when the troublemakers are making the decisions. A significant fraction of prisoners are racial minorities or were financially disenfranchised before their incarceration.
Or you could argue for the removal only where the sentence is of a certain duration, as some did following Hirst No. To the extent that felony disenfranchisement violates respect for human dignity, it too provides an additional reason to oppose it. It is not clear how many of these would otherwise be eligible to vote. This disenfranchised population includes persons currently in prison or jail as well as millions who are under probation or parole or who have completed their sentence. Jeff King: Should prisoners have the right to vote? If we thought criminals could never be reformed, we wouldn't let them out of prison in the first place.
A Human right is the right to live safely in society and breath the air. So what does that mean then? There should be bipartisan support for efforts to help ex-felons get their voting rights back, by legislators and by state and local election officials. It implicitly fails to recognise a very relevant dimension of the issue, namely that the right to vote is a fundamental human right. Place an order on our site and we will give you a great starting point for your escape. Medicine became better; schools and education improved, and treatment of our prisoners became more humane.
In state legislatures, it is usually Democrats who try to restore voting rights, and Republicans who resist. The recidivism rate for felons is extremely high. We have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility, trustworthiness, and commitment to our laws that must be met before someone is allowed a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. This has led some to infer that they are more interested in votes than the well-being of convicted felons. To start this paper I will give a brief background on felon disenfranchisement in relation to race. Just because their opinion may not align with yours, doesn't mean that it should be stripped from them.
Ironically, while McAuliffe apparently believes felons can be trusted to act responsibly in the voting booth and the jury box, he does not trust them in the community at large. Given that the prison is such a closed away building from society as it is, how can we ensure that the votes cast in the prisons are legitimate? The eighth amendment prohibits excessive penalties and demands that the punishment fits the crime. Griffin, On Human Rights 2008: ch. American democracy is diminished when officeholders and political parties, for their own political gain, try to keep people from voting. Not to give a right to vote is like a penalty for prisoners , I think. Alternatively, police could exert undue influence over the prisoners and how they vote.
The treatment of former felons in the electoral system cries out for reform. Even trying to further his or her education, who would hire a convicted felon that, say raped someone or even murdered someone. This right is taken for granted by many and is exercised by far too few. Therefore, felons should be given the right… 1391 Words 6 Pages People who are felons have their rights and freedom taken away forever because they make a mistake in life. For those who interested in responsibilities, I co-authored a report for the Ministry of Justice in 2009 on this question. The authenticity of an administration lies in the way that…. This essay will examine the history behind the debate of prisoners voting and, give reasons in favour of the ban and opposing to the ban, whilst strongly promoting the view that prisoners should not have the right to vote.
One can at once see the allure and limitations of this argument. It is not difficult to see why so many people think that internationally imposed human rights laws tend to go a bit too far, to the point of imposing on the sovereignty of an independent nation, particularly in light of two recent instances. It is among the better reasons for why we normally obey community rules though not always, see Raz, The Authority of Law 1979: Ch. We can no longer grant that right to non-incarcerated citizens as a matter of free speech and deny it to prisoners, who are, according to the Supreme Court, citizens no less. It's set to hold a debate on whether some or all prisoners should be given the right to vote. Although they have done wrong, Some people might have done it for justice and you have to understand that they are standing up for what is right too.