Books control that path because the brain isn't actually using the imagination while reading but translating the words into visuals used to imagine the books plot. It is, tv are much better than book as there are more variatives to choose from while a book has only limited source of information. Since film is also kind of business. Nevertheless books are the first sources from where all information brings. If you don't have a dedicated theater room, you'll need room-darkening blinds. Welcome to CreateDebate CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
I think it is much easier to exercise watching tv then reading a book. There are many ways of looking at how something is better or even better for you. Nowadays television has bad influence not only on children but also on adults. Television allows for faster communication of the weather and news but also events are covered through television like sports and elections. The two are very different ways of delivering information to us. Reading books is a proactive function plus expands the readers literary skills. A book may take 30 hours to read but it has to fit into 90 minutes for a movie.
Is it bad for you? Yes, the movies the freaking amazing and they have made up my many lonely weekends. Great post, thanks for stopping by my blog. A good point is made about being able to pace yourself with books. From many many years people are used to read and only books teach them to become literate person and despite of the developing modern technology devices the selling of the books are never giving up. They would be saved, wouldn't they? Photo courtesy of Pixabay, public domain Television The average American home has 2.
Time is money these days, and after such hectic schedules, people hardly get time to read. Books can be read … at any pace, they'll be waiting whenever you get back to them and if it's a text book, you can read sections over and over again, whenever you want to. Anything that allows you to see the screen when the projector and lights are turned off is going to adversely affect the contrast of the image. The post was mostly in response to people who ask me why I bother to read since you can just wait for the movie watch the story faster and with less effort. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part.
So what if the actors were crap but you still got the jist of the thing you were watching. I also think that books expand vocabulary and improve spelling and grammar more efficiently. Adolescents would learn from educational documentaries far better than reading a whole book about a certain topic. It is better to read a book in one day and improve your mind and etc. Watching television is just emotional development, reading books is spiritual development. Action sequences — yes you can read action sequences but I find them quite dull.
There are a lot of shortcuts needed to trim that amount of time away from a story. I would much prefer to watch, for example, a nice Danish utvecklingsfilm over reading some dumb book like Harry Potter or Goosebumps or whatever the latest fad is now. I prefer books, because we can read while travelling. This has traditionally lead to a concentration on books because a student can have their own book and carry it around easily. Unfair comparisons between books an movies have long gone uncontested.
Books are always more detailed and they allow you to use your imagination. During the day, I often bring a book with me when I head out in case I need to wait or have a moment to spare. Learning from tv is just as well if not better than learning from a book. Because they would just get in the way or start trouble. But books inable to reader to learn at thier own pace and process information at a pace best for them, while a tv show requires less effort. In a similar vein, a book will not tell you to switch off your mobile phone, or try to sell you loyalty cards that you neither want or need.
I totally agree with her. But I love a good comedy or drama series on television. There is some setup involved, especially if you're looking for permanent mounting. I had ten very good reasons and in the comments left there were probably another ten mentioned. With reading, it is true that you are left to create a visual image of what is being depicted. And you learn so much about writing just from reading it.
And that is really the whole point. This will be described in as much detail as the author wants in print. Not only this world it this us knowledge about many galaxies, planets, stars, universe etc. I noticed this as a recurring theme in Fahrenheit 451. Farsi: Cristmas-e-shoma mobarak bashad Finnish: Hyvaa joulua Flemish: Zalig Kerstfeest en Gelukkig nieuw jaar French: Joyeux Noel Frisian: Noflike Krystdagen en in protte Lok en Seine yn it Nije Jier! Television is all about packaging a bunch of cool little bits together quickly. I agree with all points especially nos. All scores are updated in real-time.
I would argue against that, in my opinion reading books far outweighs watching television. German: Fröhliche Weihnachten Greek: Kala Christouyenna! But the computer really is the better source then both books or tv. First of all television and Internet are devices which make people degraded. As far as what's better, it depends on theapplication. Other people, like a friend of mine with epilepsy, cannot do watch television or play games. Surveys have found that a normal person can remember 10% of what he had read and 50% of what he had listened and watched. Meanwhile 26 percent of those who read a book said they enjoyed learning, gaining knowledge, and discovering information.